87,673 verified reviews · 4.95 average · every one published in full, unedited, nothing filtered by rating
Review archive

Answered from 87,673 customer reviews

Are BJJ Fanatics instructionals good for older or injured grapplers?

Yes, and it is a well-served part of the catalogue. 1,490 reviews raise age, injury or reduced athleticism, rating 4.96 out of 5. 558 name a specific injury, most often knees and backs, and describe training around it with this material.

What the evidence shows

91 of these reviews make the specific claim that the material works without speed or strength, at 5.0 average. That is the claim an older grappler is actually testing before buying.

52 describe the approach as low-impact or efficient rather than athletic. Read those alongside the per-title pages, since this is a property of particular instructionals rather than of the store.

How the matching reviews are rated

The 1,490 matching reviews sit at 4.96 on average, against 4.95 for the archive as a whole. 0 of them carry one or two stars.

5 star1,428 (96%)
4 star60 (4%)
3 star2 (0.1%)
2 star0 (0%)
1 star0 (0%)

Evidence table

Each row counts, among the 1,490 matching reviews, how many contain a phrase pattern for that theme. One review can satisfy several patterns and then appears under each of them, which is why the column does not add up. Rows are ordered by count.

Phrase patterns found in reviews matching “Are BJJ Fanatics instructionals good for older or injured grapplers?
What the review saysReviewsShareAverage rating
Mentions age or being older1,07672%4.96
Mentions a specific injury or surgery55837%4.94
Says it works despite reduced athleticism916.1%5.0
Says the material is low-impact or easy on the body523.5%4.96
Recommends it to other older grapplers130.9%5.0

What positive reviewers wrote

Reproduced in full, exactly as submitted. These come from the 1,488 matching reviews rated four or five stars, 100% of the set.

What critical reviewers wrote

The same question, taken from the 2 matches at three stars or under. Published unedited and at the same length as the positive ones, because an archive that quotes only praise is not worth reading.

Other questions