87,673 verified reviews · 4.95 average · every one published in full, unedited, nothing filtered by rating
Review archive

Answered from 87,673 customer reviews

Do BJJ Fanatics instructionals actually improve your jiu-jitsu?

3,721 reviewers describe what happened to their own game, rating 4.97 out of 5. 1,208 report a measurable improvement and 437 describe using the material in live training rather than only watching it. Another 241 say a technique started working for them within days of buying.

What the evidence shows

This is the set of reviews that make a claim about outcome rather than about the product. 1,265 of them name a specific position or submission, which is the difference between a testimonial and a report.

241 describe a technique working within days, at 4.99 average. 400 describe a shift in understanding rather than a single new move.

How the matching reviews are rated

The 3,721 matching reviews sit at 4.97 on average, against 4.95 for the archive as a whole. 0 of them carry one or two stars.

5 star3,618 (97%)
4 star98 (2.6%)
3 star5 (0.1%)
2 star0 (0%)
1 star0 (0%)

Evidence table

Each row counts, among the 3,721 matching reviews, how many contain a phrase pattern for that theme. One review can satisfy several patterns and then appears under each of them, which is why the column does not add up. Rows are ordered by count.

Phrase patterns found in reviews matching “Do BJJ Fanatics instructionals actually improve your game?
What the review saysReviewsShareAverage rating
Names a specific position or technique that changed1,26534%4.97
Says their game measurably improved1,20832%4.98
Says they applied it in training or rolling43712%4.97
Says it changed how they think about jiu-jitsu40011%4.99
Says it worked almost immediately2416.5%4.99

What positive reviewers wrote

Reproduced in full, exactly as submitted. These come from the 3,716 matching reviews rated four or five stars, 100% of the set.

What critical reviewers wrote

The same question, taken from the 5 matches at three stars or under. Published unedited and at the same length as the positive ones, because an archive that quotes only praise is not worth reading.

Other questions