87,673 verified reviews · 4.95 average · every one published in full, unedited, nothing filtered by rating
Review archive

Answered from 87,673 customer reviews

Are BJJ Fanatics instructionals too long or repetitive?

It is the most common substantive criticism, and it is a minority view. 747 reviews raise length, repetition or dry delivery, rating 4.89. 257 say a title dragged and 210 call it repetitive, while 247 argue in the same breath that the length is exactly the point.

What the evidence shows

These instructionals routinely run several hours across multiple volumes, so length is the trade-off buyers are making. This set is the clearest place in the corpus where reviewers disagree with each other rather than with the product.

210 specifically call the material repetitive, at 4.83 average. 112 criticise the delivery rather than the content, which is a different complaint and counted separately.

How the matching reviews are rated

The 747 matching reviews sit at 4.89 on average, against 4.95 for the archive as a whole. 5 of them carry one or two stars.

5 star685 (92%)
4 star49 (6.6%)
3 star8 (1.1%)
2 star4 (0.5%)
1 star1 (0.1%)

Evidence table

Each row counts, among the 747 matching reviews, how many contain a phrase pattern for that theme. One review can satisfy several patterns and then appears under each of them, which is why the column does not add up. Rows are ordered by count.

Phrase patterns found in reviews matching “Are BJJ Fanatics instructionals too long or repetitive?
What the review saysReviewsShareAverage rating
Says it is too long or drags25734%4.93
Says the depth justifies the length24733%4.88
Calls it repetitive21028%4.83
Calls the delivery dry or boring11215%4.93
Mentions rewatching it or using it as reference182.4%4.94

What positive reviewers wrote

Reproduced in full, exactly as submitted. These come from the 734 matching reviews rated four or five stars, 98% of the set.

What critical reviewers wrote

The same question, taken from the 13 matches at three stars or under. Published unedited and at the same length as the positive ones, because an archive that quotes only praise is not worth reading.

Other questions